10-Q Q2 2026Filed 5 Aug 2026

AppLovin Corporation

NASDAQ: APP · Advertising technology
10-Q Q2 2026
Filed 5 Aug 2026

Analysis of AppLovin Corporation’s Q2 2026 10-Q

Filing dated 5 August 2026 for the quarter ended 30 June 2026

3 lead findings (3 medium)
At a glance

Where the filing and the story diverge

AppLovin’s Q2 numbers are exceptional: revenue up 53% to $1.92B, a 77.7% operating margin and net income of $1.27B. The 10-Q shows few accounting risks. The questions are narrower: cash conversion fell as cash taxes jumped, share-based pay grew almost three times as fast as revenue and now makes up 69% of R&D, and the company still owes $346.5M on a cloud-computing commitment.

In brief
  • Three findings: Cash conversion fell as cash taxes jumped sixfold; Share-based pay rose 148%, and is now 69% of R&D; Compute costs are growing slower than revenue, with $346.5M still to pay on a cloud commitment. Each is set out below with the figure, where it sits in the filing and what would close it.
  • What it does not show. Nothing here shows a misstatement.
What the release already tells you
Well covered elsewhere, so not the subject of this report
Q2 revenue
$1,923.7M, up 53%
Operating margin
77.7%
Net income
$1,266.5M
Adjusted EBITDA
$1,613.8M, 83.9% margin
Net debt
$461.8M
Risk assessment

Area by area: what is solid and what is stretched

AppLovin’s margins, revenue growth and balance sheet are strong. The open questions are cash conversion, the pace of share-based pay, and how much guidance now relies on improvements already live.

5 low2 medium0 elevated0 high
Cash conversionMedium
OCF 0.87x net income
Cash taxes up sixfold. See Finding 01.
Share-based payMedium
+148% vs revenue +53%
Still only 4.5% of revenue. See Finding 02.
CommitmentsLow
$346.5M left to pay
About 11% of cash. See Finding 03.
ReceivablesLow
+19% over six months
About 102 days of Q2 revenue; no credit-loss allowance disclosed.
DebtLow
Net debt $461.8M
Down from $1,025.9M at December.
Non-operating incomeLow
4% of pre-tax income
Unrealised investment gains of $31.3M in Q2.
Related partiesLow
Tripledot revenue about 1% of total
$18.0M in Q2.
Lead findings

Three findings, ranked by importance

Each is set out in full below: what the filing shows, the numbers, the evidence and what would close it.

Finding 01 · Medium

Cash conversion fell as cash taxes jumped sixfold

Six-month operating cash flow was $2,160M against net income of $2,472M. Cash taxes paid rose to $639.8M from $100.6M, and Q2 free cash flow was 53.5% of adjusted EBITDA against 75.4% a year earlier.

What the filing shows

Management attributes the shortfall to the timing of international cash taxes and interest, and expects full-year free cash flow to return to about 75% of adjusted EBITDA. Receivables also absorbed $352.6M in the half and accrued liabilities $125.0M. Q2 operating cash flow was 0.69 times Q2 net income (our calculation). The effective tax rate rose to 15.9% from 12.7%, consistent with the higher cash tax bill.

The numbers
$100.6MCash taxes paid, H1 2025
$639.8MCash taxes paid, H1 2026
How the gap was filled

10-Q cash flow statement and supplemental cash flow disclosures; the call for management’s explanation.

Finding 02 · Medium

Share-based pay rose 148%, and is now 69% of R&D

Total share-based pay rose to $85.8M from $34.6M. R&D share-based pay quadrupled to $68.9M, 69% of R&D expense; excluding it, R&D grew about 15% (our calculation).

What the filing shows

At 4.5% of revenue, share-based pay is still low for a software company, so this is a question of direction rather than size. R&D expense rose 127% to $99.9M, almost entirely from equity awards. Buybacks of $1.5B in the half reduced shares outstanding by about 3.0M, so far more than offsetting the dilution from awards.

The numbers
69%R&D
Share-based pay in R&D $68.9M 69%Rest of R&D $31M 31%Total $99.9M
How the gap was filled

The 10-Q share-based pay note, broken down by expense line.

Finding 03 · Medium

Compute costs are growing slower than revenue, with $346.5M still to pay on a cloud commitment

Datacentre costs rose 40% to $181.0M while revenue rose 53%, about 7.8 cents per incremental revenue dollar against management’s guide of about 10 cents. Of a $1.3B amended compute commitment, $953.5M has been paid, leaving $346.5M.

What the filing shows

The remaining commitment is about 11% of cash, so it is easily covered. The disclosures come through AppLovin’s own XBRL tags for datacentre costs and purchase-obligation payments, which do not exist in the standard taxonomy. AppLovin also changed its guidance approach on the call: the Q3 guide now includes model improvements already live, where it previously excluded unreleased improvements, which makes guidance comparisons less like-for-like.

The numbers
73%27%
Compute commitment paid to date $953.5MCompute commitment remaining $346.5MTotal $1,300M
How the gap was filled

10-Q segment cost table and commitments note; the call for the compute guide.

Lead findings · also reviewed

Other findings, checked and set aside

Each item was tested against the filing. None changes the lead findings above.

ItemWhat the filing shows, and why it is not a lead finding
XBRL: three custom tags carry new numbersDatacentre costs ($181.0M), purchase-obligation payments ($953.5M) and the amended commitment ($1.3B) sit on AppLovin’s own tags; all match the printed notes.
XBRL: three different scales in one filingStatements are in thousands, the related-party note in millions and insider-plan figures in single shares, which can mislead anyone pulling the data automatically.
Adjusted EBITDA reconciliationRebuilt from net income: $1,613.8M ties exactly.
Apps sale (2025)$715.6M consideration including Tripledot shares worth $285.0M; a $106.2M pre-tax gain in the first half of 2025.
Internal-use softwareSoftware development is expensed, with no material capitalisation, a conservative policy.
Not disclosedRemaining performance obligations, billings, a receivables credit-loss allowance and the foreign cash split are not in the 10-Q.
What changed since 31 December 2025

7 disclosures moved

10-Q Q2 2026 compared with the 10-K for 31 December 2025.

StatusDisclosureBeforeNow
RemovedDiscontinued operations (Apps business)
Q2 2026 vs Q2 2025 · income statement
+$47.7M in Q2 2025None
NewASU 2025-06 (internal-use software)
Adopted early, 1 January 2026
Not adoptedAdopted, no material impact
ChangedCompute commitment paid
Commitments note
Partly paid$953.5M of $1.3B paid
ChangedNet debt
Balance sheet (our calculation)
$1,025.9M$461.8M
ChangedGuidance approach
Q2 call
Excluded unreleased improvementsIncludes live model improvements
RemovedSEC inquiry
Q2 call
Voluntary request openConcluded with no recommended action
ChangedInsider trading plan (V. Valenzuela)
10-Q Part II
Plan ended 15 May 2026New plan adopted 11 June 2026
What stands out

The first quarter with no discontinued operations, a new accounting standard adopted, a closed SEC inquiry and a change in how guidance is set.

What to watch

5 markers for 4 November

Set before the numbers, so the read can be checked afterwards.

MarkerNowGap widens ifGap closes ifResult
Q3 revenueGuided at $2,055M to $2,085MBelow $2,055MWithin or above the rangeAwaiting
Q3 adjusted EBITDAGuided at $1,710M to $1,740MBelow $1,710MWithin or above the rangeAwaiting
Free cash flow conversion53.5% of adjusted EBITDA in Q2; management expects about 75% for the yearQ3 conversion stays at or below Q2’s 53.5%It moves back toward 75%Awaiting
Incremental compute costAbout 7.8 cents per extra revenue dollarAbove management’s guide of about 10 centsAt or below about 10 centsAwaiting
Share-based pay+148% in Q2 against revenue +53%Again grows faster than revenueGrows no faster than revenueAwaiting

These are monitoring checks set before the numbers, not forecasts of a loss or breach.

Questions for management

6 questions, checked against the call

Raised by the 10-Q. To be tested again at Q3 results on 4 November.

1
Compute costs
Incremental datacentre cost was 7.8 cents per extra revenue dollar in Q2 and 6.8 cents over six months. How does that reconcile to the ~10 cent guide, and what cost curve is in the Q3 EBITDA guide?
Direct answer: A reconciliation and an assumption. A deflection would sound like: We remain within our guide
2
Free cash flow
How much of the Q2 free cash flow shortfall was international tax timing versus interest timing, and when does conversion return to about 75%?
Direct answer: A split and a quarter. A deflection would sound like: It is timing
3
Receivables
Receivables rose 19% over six months to $2,171M, about 102 days of Q2 revenue. Has any group of advertisers been given extended payment terms?
Direct answer: A yes or no and the terms. A deflection would sound like: Collections are healthy
4
Share-based pay
R&D share-based pay rose fourfold to $68.9M, 69% of R&D. What headcount and grant assumptions are behind it, and does the Q3 guide assume more?
Direct answer: Assumptions and a direction. A deflection would sound like: We are investing in talent
5
Tripledot
How is Tripledot revenue ($42.9M in six months) priced against arm’s-length terms, and is it settled in cash?
Direct answer: The pricing basis and settlement. A deflection would sound like: It is immaterial
6
Apps sale
Is there any earn-out, working-capital true-up or indemnity remaining on the Apps sale that could affect future quarters?
Direct answer: A yes or no and amounts. A deflection would sound like: The sale closed in 2025
On the radar and limits

What this does and does not show

On the radarQ2 2026 Form 10-Q, related-party note

Revenue from a company AppLovin part-owns

AppLovin earned $18.0M in Q2 ($42.9M in six months) from Tripledot, in which it took about 22% when it sold its Apps business; about 1% of revenue.

Not tested on a call in this read.

What would resolve this: Pricing and cash settlement terms are disclosed.

On the radarQ2 2026 Form 10-Q, equity note

Buybacks continue at pace

$1.5B of repurchases in six months, with $1.8B of authorisation remaining; shares outstanding fell by about 3.0M.

Not tested on a call in this read.

What would resolve this: Buybacks stay funded from free cash flow.

On the radarQ2 2026 earnings call

Guidance now includes live model improvements

The Q3 guide includes model improvements already in production, a change from the prior approach of excluding them.

Not tested on a call in this read.

What would resolve this: Results land within the guide on the new basis.

What is not established

Nothing here shows a misstatement.

Margins, growth and the balance sheet are strong, the commitment is well covered, and the cash shortfall is explained as timing.

What happens next
5 AugQ2 2026 10-Q filed
4 NovQ3 results, after the close
Next 10-QMarkers and promises scored
Would lower concern
  • Free cash flow conversion returns toward 75%
  • Share-based pay slows to revenue growth
  • Compute cost stays under the guide
  • Results land within the new-basis guide
Would raise concern
  • Cash conversion stays near 53%
  • Share-based pay keeps outgrowing revenue
  • Compute cost per revenue dollar rises past 10 cents
  • Receivables keep outgrowing revenue
Sources and method

Every figure ties back to the filing

AppLovin Form 10-Q, quarter ended 30 June 2026Open ↗
Q2 2026 results release (Exhibit 99.1), 5 August 2026Filed with the SEC
Q2 2026 earnings callThird-party transcripts
Method

Helmledgers reads the full filing, including the notes, and ties every figure to the statement or note it comes from, with each number re-checked against the source before release. This is an accounting read of public SEC filings, not an audit opinion and not investment advice.

How to read this report
Severity
High: material effect on cash, debt or reported results. Medium: worth tracking, smaller or less certain effect.
On the call
Direct answer, Partly answered (topic addressed, figure missing), Sidestepped (raised but not answered) or Not asked.
Since the read
Confirmed by a later disclosure, Escalated (grown since), Open (untested) or Missed (not flagged by the read).
Said versus done
Kept, Slipped (late), Changed (plan or terms changed), Missed or Reversed.
Markers
Measurable checks set before results, each with what would widen or close the gap. Scored after the next results.
Closes if
The evidence that would resolve a finding.
Positions & research disclaimer

Helmledgers and its analysts hold no position in AppLovin (APP) securities.

This is an accounting read of public SEC filings. It is not an audit opinion and not investment advice.

Join the Helmledgers beta

Free full access while we’re in beta: every report and every scorecard as results come in, plus your own portfolio and watchlist.

Join the beta, free →